Should we completely trust `infores:drugcentral`?

[chunyuma]

@dkoslicki @edeutsch,

I found the infores:drugcentral edge also contains the publication information (see the infores:drugcentral edge in result 69). It seems like not all infores:drugcentral edges have the publication information.

My question is: for the new ranking algorithm, except for the SemMedDB, if the edge from other knowledge providers also contains 'attribute_type_id': 'biolink:publications', should we consider its publication number in the algorithm?

For example:

  {'attribute_source': 'infores:drugcentral',
   'attribute_type_id': 'biolink:publications',
   'attributes': None,
   'description': None,
   'original_attribute_name': None,
   'value': ['PMID:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24786236'],
   'value_type_id': 'biolink:Uriorcurie',
   'value_url': None}

Currently, the weight for publications is 0.5, for text-mining-provider is 0.8, for drugcentral is 1.

The confidence is calculated as: normalized score x weight. The normalized score for both drugcentral and text-mining-provider is 1 while the normalized score for publications is based on the publication count.