Fixes clock_gettime and rt_ktime_boottime_get_ns
拉取/合并请求描述:(PR description)
continue work of https://github.com/RT-Thread/rt-thread/pull/9008
Fixes overflow of clock_gettime rt_ktime_boottime_get_ns thoroughly
Currently the return value of clock_gettime and rt_ktime_boottime_get_ns are restricted by rt_ktime_cputimer_getres, as the value of rt_ktime_cputimer_getres are not exactly represent the frequency of the clock, directly using rt_ktime_cputimer_getfrq will ensure the return value of rt_ktime_boottime_get_ns be more exact.
And also add function rt_muldiv_u64 rt_muldiv_u32 for not losing precision when convert between cputimer and hrtimer and nanoseconds.
Because rt_ktime_boottime_get_ns depends on rt_ktime_cputimer_getcnt and rt_ktime_cputimer_getcnt depends rt_tick_get
So the rt_tick_t should be 64bit for long running program.
Use #if defined(ARCH_CPU_64BIT) is for
future allow rt_tick_t can be 64bit on 32bit CPU.
Tick count should not be restricted to the CPU
[
为什么提交这份PR (why to submit this PR)
你的解决方案是什么 (what is your solution)
请提供验证的bsp和config (provide the config and bsp)
- BSP:
- .config:
- action:
]
当前拉取/合并请求的状态 Intent for your PR
必须选择一项 Choose one (Mandatory):
- [x] 本拉取/合并请求是一个草稿版本 This PR is for a code-review and is intended to get feedback
- [ ] 本拉取/合并请求是一个成熟版本 This PR is mature, and ready to be integrated into the repo
代码质量 Code Quality:
我在这个拉取/合并请求中已经考虑了 As part of this pull request, I've considered the following:
- [x] 已经仔细查看过代码改动的对比 Already check the difference between PR and old code
- [x] 代码风格正确,包括缩进空格,命名及其他风格 Style guide is adhered to, including spacing, naming and other styles
- [x] 没有垃圾代码,代码尽量精简,不包含
#if 0代码,不包含已经被注释了的代码 All redundant code is removed and cleaned up - [x] 所有变更均有原因及合理的,并且不会影响到其他软件组件代码或BSP All modifications are justified and not affect other components or BSP
- [x] 对难懂代码均提供对应的注释 I've commented appropriately where code is tricky
- [x] 代码是高质量的 Code in this PR is of high quality
- [ ] 已经使用formatting 等源码格式化工具确保格式符合RT-Thread代码规范 This PR complies with RT-Thread code specification
- [ ] 如果是新增bsp, 已经添加ci检查到.github/ALL_BSP_COMPILE.json 详细请参考链接BSP自查
👋 感谢您对 RT-Thread 的贡献!Thank you for your contribution to RT-Thread!
为确保代码符合 RT-Thread 的编码规范,请在你的仓库中执行以下步骤运行代码格式化工作流。 To ensure your code complies with RT-Thread's coding style, please run the code formatting workflow by following the steps below.
🛠 操作步骤 | Steps
-
前往 Actions 页面 | Go to the Actions page 点击进入工作流 → | Click to open workflow →
-
点击
Run workflow| ClickRun workflow
- 设置需排除的文件/目录(目录请以"/"结尾) Set files/directories to exclude (directories should end with "/")
- 将目标分支设置为 \ Set the target branch to:
rt_tick_t_64_bit - 设置PR number为 \ Set the PR number to:
10749
- 等待工作流完成 | Wait for the workflow to complete 格式化后的代码将自动推送至你的分支。 The formatted code will be automatically pushed to your branch.
完成后,提交将自动更新至 rt_tick_t_64_bit 分支,关联的 Pull Request 也会同步更新。
Once completed, commits will be pushed to the rt_tick_t_64_bit branch automatically, and the related Pull Request will be updated.
如有问题欢迎联系我们,再次感谢您的贡献!💐 If you have any questions, feel free to reach out. Thanks again for your contribution!
📌 Code Review Assignment
🏷️ Tag: components
Reviewers: @Maihuanyi
Changed Files (Click to expand)
- components/drivers/ktime/inc/ktime.h
- components/drivers/ktime/src/aarch64/cputimer.c
- components/drivers/ktime/src/boottime.c
- components/drivers/ktime/src/cputimer.c
- components/drivers/ktime/src/hrtimer.c
- components/drivers/ktime/src/risc-v/virt64/cputimer.c
- components/drivers/rtc/dev_soft_rtc.c
- components/libc/compilers/common/ctime.c
🏷️ Tag: components_libc
Reviewers: @GorrayLi @mysterywolf
Changed Files (Click to expand)
- components/libc/compilers/common/ctime.c
🏷️ Tag: kernel
Reviewers: @GorrayLi @ReviewSun @hamburger-os @lianux-mm @wdfk-prog @xu18838022837
Changed Files (Click to expand)
- src/rttypes.c
📊 Current Review Status (Last Updated: 2025-11-12 13:18 CST)
- ⌛ @GorrayLi Pending Review
- ⌛ @Maihuanyi Pending Review
- ⌛ @ReviewSun Pending Review
- ⌛ @hamburger-os Pending Review
- ⌛ @lianux-mm Pending Review
- ⌛ @mysterywolf Pending Review
- ⌛ @wdfk-prog Pending Review
- ⌛ @xu18838022837 Pending Review
📝 Review Instructions
-
维护者可以通过单击此处来刷新审查状态: 🔄 刷新状态 Maintainers can refresh the review status by clicking here: 🔄 Refresh Status
-
确认审核通过后评论
LGTM/lgtmCommentLGTM/lgtmafter confirming approval -
PR合并前需至少一位维护者确认 PR must be confirmed by at least one maintainer before merging
ℹ️ 刷新CI状态操作需要具备仓库写入权限。 ℹ️ Refresh CI status operation requires repository Write permission.
@Rbb666 ping