Add chronological (oldest to newest) sorting option for content feeds
Clear and concise description of the problem
Description
Currently, Follow displays content in reverse chronological order (newest to oldest) across all feed types including articles, Twitter posts, and Weibo posts. While this is common for social media platforms, it can sometimes disrupt the natural reading flow, especially in the following scenarios:
Current Issues:
- When reading Twitter threads, we often see replies before the original post, making it difficult to understand the context
- For article series or sequential content, newer posts appear first, forcing readers to scroll down to find the beginning
- Following story developments or news updates becomes challenging as we need to read backwards
Feature Request: I suggest adding a sorting toggle button that allows users to switch between:
- Newest to oldest (current default)
- Oldest to newest (chronological)
Benefits:
- Improved reading experience for sequential content
- Better context understanding for Twitter conversations
- More natural content consumption flow
- Enhanced user control over content organization
Suggested solution
Suggested Implementation: A simple toggle button in the feed view that:
- Persists user preference per feed type
- Can be set globally or per subscription
- Maintains the current default (newest first) while giving users the option to switch
This feature would significantly enhance the reading experience on Follow, especially for users who prefer to consume content in its natural chronological progression.
Alternative
No response
Additional context
No response
Validations
- [X] Check that there isn't already an issue that request the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.
ๅ้ๆฑ
Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. ๐ฏ๐ญ๐ป๐งโ๐คโ๐ง๐ซ๐ง๐ฟโ๐คโ๐ง๐ป๐ฉ๐พโ๐คโ๐จ๐ฟ๐ฌ๐ฟ
Same requirement
Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. ๐ฏ๐ญ๐ป๐งโ๐คโ๐ง๐ซ๐ง๐ฟโ๐คโ๐ง๐ป๐ฉ๐พโ๐คโ๐จ๐ฟ๐ฌ๐ฟ
Same requirement
Duplicate of #425
Thank you very much for your suggestion, let us track this issue there
่ฟไธชๅ่ฝ้ๆฑ็็ๅพๆฎ้ๅ๏ผไธบไปไนๅฐฑๆฏไธๅ ๅข๏ผnot planned๏ผ็ญไบ่ฟไนไน ๏ผๅบ่ฏฅไนไธ้พๅงใ
Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. ๐ฏ๐ญ๐ป๐งโ๐คโ๐ง๐ซ๐ง๐ฟโ๐คโ๐ง๐ป๐ฉ๐พโ๐คโ๐จ๐ฟ๐ฌ๐ฟ
This function requirement is really common, why just not add it? Not planned. It shouldn't be difficult after waiting for so long.