Ingvar Stepanyan
Ingvar Stepanyan
@spicyj I know, that's what I'm saying - IIRC, I remember using this feature with the original React's transpiler.
I believe this is confusing and unneeded syntax complication. Why can't you just nest components into each others in code?
If you want to compose new class, then it will be most likely reused and you should really just store it in a variable. If you just want to use...
@NekR > In your code you instantiate `ImageDropTarget` twice I believe @npryce wants React to merge them automagically and instantiate once (which is too magical IMO).
@syranide It just feels like this addition opens a wormhole that might lead to a worse code where we would see e.g. ``` javascript return My Content ; ``` I...
I just wonder if people ever put such an explicit list of whitespace characters but mean `\s`, or maybe safer to just remove this particular optimisation and assume people wrote...
> or, if it's very rare, to keep, and allow to opt-out when needed I don't think keeping it as-is is a very good idea, *especially* if it's rarely used,...
UglifyJS actually does have separate parsing (http://lisperator.net/uglifyjs/parser) / compression (http://lisperator.net/uglifyjs/compress) stages, and allows writing own transformers (http://lisperator.net/uglifyjs/transform).
Works perfectly for me too. Thanks @jcberthon!
> If I understand correctly, the worst case of a race here is that the underlying function will be called twice instead of once Yes, this is the problem, because...