Ingvar Stepanyan
Ingvar Stepanyan
> while `wasm-bindgen` is enabled there are compilation issues Why would you enable wasm-bindgen on other platforms? Either way, given how long this PR was open and given that there...
Wow, this is great idea!
I thought it's easier to do on your side by including AtScript support via additional flag in [Traceur Repl](http://google.github.io/traceur-compiler/demo/repl.html) since, AFAIU, AtScript is built on top of it.
As far as I played with it - it's rather problem with `toInteger` in general (I tried replacing `max` with custom ternary operator, but speed difference was negligible.
@DmitrySoshnikov Started trying but noticed that currently AST lacks line/column locations, and my understanding is that regexps are not necessarily single-line... Would need to have such locations available in AST...
Great, thanks! Maybe we can merge all the breaking changes together into a new release?
What should ``` html ``` and ``` html ``` and ``` html ``` do? It brings too much questions, conflicts and undefined behavior IMO.
@seanmonstar Any chance to review this? I'm actually interesting in Accept not Accept-Encoding, but this seems to lay a solid foundation for other similar headers as per #7.
This seems to encapsulate most APIs behind methods pretty well, except for yeah, `QualityItem`. Is there any better alternative it could be replaced with? Not having `Accept*` headers is pretty...
Suddenly having same issue for libusb too (which is definitely open-source).