Ingvar Stepanyan
Ingvar Stepanyan
@michaelficarra Ah, I see where the misunderstanding came from. Agreed, that's a bug.
Simple wrapping code into a IIFE fixes the issue, but I believe it should be "resolved" even when not wrapped.
As far as I understand, `window.variable` can appear inside IIFE as well, so it doesn't really help if you avoid it only in the global scope. On the other hand,...
In any case, ability to get them as `resolved` through flag would be definitely sufficient for my needs, everything else is just pure interest :)
Thanks for a detailed explanation! > But I also think it's a little bit too stict ;) Yeah, I also think that people don't use `delete` often enough to make...
> Do we still need to do a new build of Rustup? Yes, this is still happening to me on MSYS as well: ``` $ curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf...
Note: this is related to this comment: https://github.com/rustwasm/walrus/pull/71#issuecomment-545654296 by @philipc.
> Should we call `convert_address` on each individual instruction and recalculate offsets FWIW this seems most reasonable IMO, and doesn't require any API changes, but I'm not sure if there...
So for now I played with a branch to implement conversion directly in `convert_address` - that works somewhat fine, but tricky to extend correctly to relocations. But yeah personally I...