Eric Sauvageau
Eric Sauvageau
I currently don't plan on adding more DDNS services, as there are simply too many and that would require actively maintaining them whenever there's an API change.
inadyn can take weeks, if not months to adapt to API changes (the author often has to rely on outside contributors as he doesn't have accounts for every supported providers)....
I'm not sure I understand the idea of defining a -9 offset on top of what is already a UTC-9 offset. Also, the use of strncpy() here is wrong, as...
This will require further work, as it completely messes up the table layout. Unfortunately the addition of the new Source IP field leaves little room to insert an additional button,...
Just redirecting won't be enough, since the https port might not be 443. This will have to be taken into consideration. Also, I would prefer a radio button rather than...
Wouldn't handling this in httpd.c as a 301 actually reduce the amount of changes required (as do_ssl wouldn't need to be moved for instance)? I was thinking of possibly handle_request()...
302 might possibly be better indeed in this case, although when I configure a customer's website to redirect http to https through mod_rewrite, I always used a 301, as 302...
Was manually removed recently, closing this.
That PR would completely overwrite Asus's numerous code changes, which would break a lot of things. Upgrading inadyn is currently very difficult due to the extent of those changes done...
Doubt it, there was some lower level changes in inadyn, in part for the IPv6 support implemented by Brainslayer.