RDmitchell

@anchapin -- thanks, I have added it to Test for Q2, so it's on my list !

Instance: dev1 SHA: c94869068 Fixed ! Thanks !! 

Has this been pushed to the staging server for testing, or should it be tested on the dev1 server? Also, should we move it to the FY 23 project and...

I just removed my giant comment with all the screenshots and my confusion to this doc https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rG8RvqvtvW8hzgSjd2T_XCDaMIqmh_Ta3g9RBBDk8mA/edit?usp=sharing I think it's better to keep this issue a bit cleaner. @dreneden1 --...

@nllong -- I am moving this to the Q2 project, setting the status to Test, with the idea that @dreneden1 will report back to us whether this implementation is what...

My one further comment about this, which is discussed in the above linked document, is that this fix only applies to GHG fields that are classified as "extra data". It...

Dan I was supposed to make a test account for you on our staging server, but it looks like you have updated your code to reflect the new units that...

@dreneden1 -- thanks for testing. It seems like the conversion is not happening properly.

@isalanglois / @nllong / @kflemin -- it doesn't seem like any work has been done on this, so I think it should be moved to the 24 Bug Fix project...

@isalanglois / @kflemin -- I removed this from the FY23 project since it is now in the FY24 bug fix project. Too confusing to be in both.