Issue 2283: Add type-review support for SPARQL query results from Graph.query

[ajnelson-nist]

Summary of changes

Checklist

• [x] Checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same change.
  • It's possible PR 2301 and/or PR 2267 will have some impact on this implementation. That's a guess from seeing the wide-ranging set of type signature complaints encountered in this PR's initial patch.
• [x] Added tests for any changes that have a runtime impact.
  • [x] Added tests for SELECT and CONSTRUCT queries
  • [x] Added tests for DESCRIBE and ASK queries
• [ ] Checked that all tests and type checking passes. (Submitter: Known to not pass yet; will pass before PR is requested to be merged.)
• For changes that have a potential impact on users of this project:
  • [ ] Updated relevant documentation to avoid inaccuracies.
  • [ ] Considered adding additional documentation.
  • [ ] Considered adding an example in ./examples for new features.
  • [ ] Considered updating our changelog (CHANGELOG.md).
• [x] Considered granting push permissions to the PR branch, so maintainers can fix minor issues and keep your PR up to date.

[aucampia]

PRs to V6 is closed until further notice. See this for more details:

• https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/discussions/2395

[aucampia]

PRs to V6 is closed until further notice. See this for more details:

• RDFLib V6 and V7 #2395

We will be open for PRs again once this is resolved:

• https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/pull/2402

[nicholascar]

@ajnelson-nist do you want to continue with this PR not that v7.x is out and we are merging PRs again?