Consider stating the copyright holder of the project

[jakelishman]

What is the expected enhancement?

At the moment, it's not clear to me from an sdist who the copyright holder is for the purposes of the Apache 2 licence, making it somewhat unclear "who" should be attributed. The only metadata in an sdist of the package is that Matt is the author, but this possibly isn't a fully accurate representation of the state or the intended state.

The Apache 2 licence file suggests putting this notice of copyright somewhere in the project:

Copyright [year] [copyright holder].

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at

    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.

but I couldn't see an equivalent anywhere here.