dcmqi icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
dcmqi copied to clipboard

Initialize private coding scheme identification

Open fedorov opened this issue 8 years ago • 8 comments

See how it is done in https://github.com/QIICR/Iowa2DICOM/blob/master/SingleTimepoint/EncodeMeasurementsSR.cxx#L997

Need to add corresponding components to JSON ...

fedorov avatar Sep 16 '16 20:09 fedorov

@pieper this is to follow up on what we discussed about providing more information about private coding scheme used.

fedorov avatar Sep 16 '16 20:09 fedorov

It seems you can put somewhat arbitrary strings in those slots, but we may want to encourage a convention that will facilitate finding out the intent of the private coding (e.g. a url to the documentation).

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Andrey Fedorov [email protected] wrote:

@pieper https://github.com/pieper this is to follow up on what we discussed about providing more information about private coding scheme used.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/QIICR/dcmqi/issues/90#issuecomment-247703042, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHsfS7lRpY5IXpuf0j12KxpPgL5d5MAks5qqv3OgaJpZM4J_UoU .

pieper avatar Sep 17 '16 14:09 pieper

@fedorov I know that the referenced source code of "SingleTimepoint/EncodeMeasurementsSR.cxx" has not been updated for a while but just in case it would be revised you might want to use a single call to DSRCodingSchemeIdentificationList::addItem(), i.e. with all 3 (or 4) parameters.

jriesmeier avatar Oct 26 '16 16:10 jriesmeier

@pieper problem is none of the attributes that can be specified to define a coding scheme is of type UR. I emailed @dclunie asking what he thinks about the possibility of adding specific attribute with the coding scheme URL (for the distant future).

fedorov avatar Jan 18 '17 22:01 fedorov

Re. adding specific attribute with the coding scheme URL, see CP 1603 [http://www.dclunie.com/dicom-status/status.html#CP1603].

dclunie avatar Jan 21 '17 17:01 dclunie

Thank you David!

FYI, CP 1603 does not have a PDF on the CPs page.

fedorov avatar Jan 21 '17 19:01 fedorov

This issue will be revisited after 1.0.0 as we will be rethinking how schemas are organized and how metadata is communicated to the converters.

fedorov avatar Feb 01 '17 18:02 fedorov

It has been our practice to discourage the use of private coding schemes, and over the years of usage, there have been very rarely a need for those. Assigning low priority.

fedorov avatar Jan 30 '24 20:01 fedorov