terence-tao-analysis
terence-tao-analysis copied to clipboard
Exercise 3.1.9: Insufficient Justification for Final Two Steps
The existing note includes the following logical steps:
$\iff (x\in A)\wedge (x\not\in B)$ $\iff (x\in A)\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad (A\cap B=\emptyset).$
However, it’s unclear how the conclusion
$$(x\in A)\wedge (x\not\in B) \iff (x\in A)$$
follows directly from the assumption that
$$A\cap B=\emptyset$$
This seems to require additional justification.