Improvements into webservice layout for the huge bots

[sefirosweb]

Hello guys, as I commented in some threads for huge bots it is quite difficult to manage what state it is in and the current interface does not help much

Therefore, I prepared some changes that I think can help the community

Changes:

• Added bar to resize the panel of behaviors and canvas

• Navigate within states doing double click on state,

  • if clicked to "start" state, they will up 1 level, will be appears a "up arrow"

  • Only can navigate if the state have sub nested states, will be appears a "down arrow"

• The tree of nested behavior has been changed, I used a new library "tree.js" to help him to generate the new tree,

  • Added buttons to open all / close all / "auto open" to track the current state active it will open the states automatically

• Added a example using nested behaviors with typescript

  • I think is important to have a typescript example to show to new users how can make it with better practices
  • For that i needed to add tsconfig.eslint.json to lint the code but ignore it from build

• Small issues fixed (name of state machine, types)

Preview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-X3EefyDvJg

This ticket can be closed: https://github.com/PrismarineJS/mineflayer-statemachine/issues/115

[rom1504]

this is big

@sefirosweb would you like to keep maintaining this package ?

[sefirosweb]

Hello @rom1504 , yes there are many changes I tried to make it as small as possible, but with the fact that more data is required and a restructuring of the tree has led me to make this code,

For maintenance I would be happy to help, for me this tool is vital for large bots

[kaduvert]

I'm just getting into statemachine development and immediately noticed the primitive nature of the web-view, so this seems crazy useful!

sad to see it's stuck, is there no maintainer who can make sense of the changes or what's the problem with this?

[rom1504]

@kaduvert yes, can you try this PR? If you like it better than master we can merge

[kaduvert]

yeah, seems like a good idea. will start my statemachine endeavours off with this and give feedback once i think i've done enough statemachine stuff to have tested this thoroughly.

[kaduvert]

so after my statemachine developments i greatly preferred the experience of this over master, encountered no errors. haven't looked much at the code but apart from some inconsistent styling / linting it seems to be fine

[sefirosweb]

Hey guys, could you please merge the pr? I have more ideas to improve the package but I don't want to mess the code anymore.

[sefirosweb]

@rom1504 any news from this topic?

[kaduvert]

@sefirosweb have you seen my PR? as said, i have no issues with your code, but i noticed some inconsistent styling / linting. i conveniently created a pull request for you to fix this: https://github.com/sefirosweb/mineflayer-statemachine/pull/1

if you could merge it i too would fully approve of these changes

[sefirosweb]

@sefirosweb have you seen my PR? as said, i have no issues with your code, but i noticed some inconsistent styling / linting. i conveniently created a pull request for you to fix this: sefirosweb#1

if you could merge it i too would fully approve of these changes

I didn't saw 🤣 , done i merge it!

[kaduvert]

@rom1504 why don't you merge this or #197 and #198 ? it's all purely additions improving the project and no breaking changes.

i get that you're scared because there's no maintainer, but there's a small community taking care of this on which you can rely on to steer the project in the right direction.

don't overcomplicate things, if something doesn't work someone will create a pr to fix it. worst case you just revert a breaking pr?