Added untyped Hydrator so type can be passed at runtime

[cjbush]

[PrintsCharming]

This is fantastic. Thank you!

It's a pretty big change so I'll rev it up appropriately.

This is a really great addition.

[cjbush]

Thanks. The limitation is obviously that you can't really pass in LINQ expressions for data constraints. I was thinking about potentially adding the ability to specify properties by name or by type, so say something like "for all properties that are ints, give it a range of 1-10" or something like that. I didn't want to go that far without getting your thoughts, though.

[PrintsCharming]

This is true. Which is why there's a failing test on Generic_CanGetSingleRestrictedDescriptionCustomer

I suppose that test doesn't really need to exist if we hold that in that usage you cannot add data constraints.