Prasad JB

Thanks @jmanico! I’ll start by drafting a sample entry for Encoding vs Escaping using the enriched format we discussed: Baseline definition (linked to OWASP / CNCF / NSA / NIST)....

Thanks @jmanico! That makes sense, I’ll start with a small PR for one sample entry (Encoding vs Escaping), so we can refine the structure together. After that, I can follow...

Hi! I’d like to work on improving the error messaging for `getStaticPaths` when a non-string parameter is passed to dynamic routes. I can add a type check to `escapePathDelimiters()` and...

This is a fantastic initiative @packtman - having a standardized framework will definitely make future Cheat Sheets more consistent and contributor-friendly. I also like @mackowski’s idea of putting it in...

This clarification is very important. the current wording can easily confuse developers about the difference between OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. In addition to the proposed fixes, it may also...

Hi @Sc00bz, I’d like to work on this issue. I’ve reviewed the section in Password_Storage_Cheat_Sheet.md and understand the wording changes needed for (N), (r), and (p). Could you please assign...

Hi @thatsjet, I see you’re working on the PR—that’s awesome! If you’d like any help drafting the logging sections for the MCP abuse events, I’d be happy to collaborate.

Hi @tghosth, Thanks for the review **1.** The PR updates the URL Checker workflow to use `actions/checkout@v4` and `gaurav-nelson/[email protected]`, which is the latest stable release. **2.** This addresses issue #71...

Hey @tghosth, you’re right, issue #71 isn’t related to workflows. This PR just updates the URL Checker workflow to use `actions/checkout@v4` and the latest `gaurav-nelson/[email protected]`. No functional changes, just keeping...

Hey @tghosth, totally understand the confusion, let me clarify a bit. The main goal here isn’t to change how the workflow behaves, but to keep it aligned with the latest...