Tobias Pfeiffer
Tobias Pfeiffer
So here's what's happening, the inner and outer stack play ping pong with each other as they both grow each other... simplified the code is like this: ``` ruby Shoes.app...
@wasnotrice I like the idea, I thought of something similar when I said that the size of relative stacks gets ignored - it just has the slight problem that they...
However, I think I don't get how it is supposed to work :) Let's look at this: ``` ruby stack do para 'para 1' stack height: 100% para 'para 2'...
Looks like besides the packaging issues this is the only thing remaining for pre4... I'll see that I give it a shot on the weekend. Although I'm still not 100%...
It's cool to bump this, if someone gets to it before pre4 is released well then it's magic and we're all good.... but true , it is a weird setup......
It's fine.. it seems like this may take much longer than initially expected.
Good idea, but I don't believe that feature exists in Shoes3 so we don't have it and are not planning on it for the 4.0 release, it's a good idea...
Hm sounds interesting. How does mouse movement interfere with the other stuff? Maybe we can find a solution as I don't think this will land any time soon... plus I...
This might be a discussion up for 4.1. But I think it is fine as it is. We could provide a keypress option, like `global: true` to get that behavior...
FYI there is an SWT abstraction for this: [TrayItem](http://help.eclipse.org/indigo/index.jsp?topic=%2Forg.eclipse.platform.doc.isv%2Freference%2Fapi%2Forg%2Feclipse%2Fswt%2Fwidgets%2FTrayItem.html) [Tray](http://help.eclipse.org/indigo/index.jsp?topic=%2Forg.eclipse.platform.doc.isv%2Freference%2Fapi%2Forg%2Feclipse%2Fswt%2Fwidgets%2FTray.html) In the mean time one could use the pure Java version. But PRs are always welcome :) @moonglum (why u...