UpdateServicesDsc resource module

[mgreenegit]

There is a new resource available for review. Thank you. https://github.com/robwi/xWSUS

[Zuldan]

@mgreenegit, thank you for all your hard work. I hope this gets approved soon. I can finally get rid of my dirty WSUS script resources.

[KarolKaczmarek]

Adding "waiting for the author" label since @PlagueHO did the review against HQRM guidelines already here: https://github.com/robwi/xWSUS/pull/4

[mgreenegit]

This module has been updated

[mgreenegit]

Just FYI, this module source has been renamed: https://github.com/robwi/updateservicesdsc

[johlju]

Adding UpdateServicesDsc resource module into the DSC Resource Kit is in progress in PR #346.

[johlju]

New resource module submission

Name: UpdateServicesDsc

Repository URL: https://github.com/mgreenegit/UpdateServicesDsc

Short description: This module contains the UpdateServicesApprovalRule, UpdateServicesCleanup, and UpdateServicesServer resources.

New resource module submission task list

This task list can be filled in after the issue has been submitted.

• [ ] Pass the Quality Governance
• [ ] Pull request is sent in (see next section).
• [ ] The new module submission in ready for community review.

Steps that pull request should include

• [ ] Added submodule using git submodule add https://github.com/<accountname>/<reponame> DscResources/<reponame>.
• [ ] Updated resource module list in Maintainers.md.

Community acceptance

Community reviewers: Please submit a comment on the issue for each box that are checked so the community know who accepted the item.

The new resource module:

• [x] is licensed under MIT.
• [ ] has the correct project structure.
• [ ] has a dev and master branch, and dev should default branch.
• [ ] is using DSC Resource Kit test templates.
• [ ] is connected to Codecov or similar.
• [ ] has established a code of conduct in ether a CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md or a 'Code of conduct' section in the README.md.
• [ ] has either a CONTRIBUTING.md file or a 'Contributing' section in the README.md file.
• [ ] has included the metadata tag 'DSCResource' in the module manifest.
• [ ] is sufficiently documented.
• [ ] has an established CI process for each push to the repository.
• [ ] is sufficiently tested.
• [ ] Follows the guidelines set out for a High Quality Resource Module.

Submission acceptance

The community accepts, at a community call, that a resource module follows the guidelines set out for a High Quality Resource Module.

• [ ] The resource module was accepted for submission in a community call.