Pomax

@ra30r I've updated all the TeX to include syntax to preserve full text, so all the Russian in formulae should show correctly on the site now. I've updated the main...

Oh nice, thank you! I don't think it'd be a replacement, more an "advanced" notes div in the section on arcs: given what arc approximation does, having C1 continuity doesn't...

Yeah, degenerate curve cases definitely need some fixing atm. (You'd think the math worked whether curves were degenerate or not, but no. Zero-deltas make that hilariously not-applicable)

Good point, at the very least explaining that this approach is limited by LUT fidelity is worth doing.

The base line is the line between start and end. As for (2) and the followup question: draw it out to understand it. Take a cubic curve, place all its...

Good start, now, do the same thing but move the control points up one grid spot, so you can see the construction skeleton, and set t to 0.5. Now what...

right, so now we know why "one third of the baseline" is at least a good approach: it matches how cubic curves already work, and we see that in the...

I can't because it depends entirely on your own aesthetic choices and the needs of your users, and what you consider "a good looking curve". You work backwards: you have...

you don't have enough weights (they go up to wk rather than wn) but the crux is this: "Because B(n+1,t) and B(n,t) represent the same curve". Because this is not...

Interesting, looks like it's even more pronounced with the points oriented as follows: I'll have a look at why it's not behaving properly.