Pikachu920

rather than allowing just a single section, i was thinking it might be better to parse anything in the `code` section a separate script (which can contain multiple structures). that...

> wasn't there something like ExprInput? that handled the inputs? it's now a separate class, ExprFilterInput

very cool! excited to see where this goes

> Let's do this, assign it to me. hell yeah godspeed @Aakashdeep-Srivastava

I like the idea of supporting this, but I also agree that the triple quotes syntax wouldn't be very friendly. I'm not necessarily proposing this, but an old addon of...

I'm open to this, but I think it should be disabled by default.

> > I don't much like the usage of indices here so if you have a better and clean way let me know > > https://github.com/SkriptLang/Skript/blob/1669cfae2c5d76cc915eb8497cc0c70c15c930ee/src/main/java/ch/njol/skript/util/Timespan.java#L51-L57 > > Same goes...

> > I don't much like the usage of indices here so if you have a better and clean way let me know > > https://github.com/SkriptLang/Skript/blob/1669cfae2c5d76cc915eb8497cc0c70c15c930ee/src/main/java/ch/njol/skript/util/Timespan.java#L51-L57 > > Same goes...

> `getAcceptedChangeModes` getAcceptedChangeModes is intended for documentation purposes, not real logic

alternative syntax suggestion: `%objects% sorted based on %expression%` e.x. `{_items::*} sorted based on name of item`