Sampark Sharma

Closing due to no activity

Closing this PR as already addressed in https://github.com/actions/starter-workflows/pull/1735

@mvecha Sorry for this being here for so long. I would love to close it now. Can you merge the main again?

Does it mean any/all efficient algorithms are welcome?

@Logarithmus There is some technical challenge in understanding the **base** branch for any branch so for now we have updated the docs to address this behaviour.

Closing this issue as public docs are updated: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/caching-dependencies-to-speed-up-workflows#restrictions-for-accessing-a-cache @Logarithmus You may open a new issue with the expected behaviour. We can track that separately

There is work going on here. There was a similar [PR](https://github.com/actions/cache/pull/743). You may want to track work related to granular cache control here: https://github.com/actions/cache/discussions/1020

Have updated the error message to show other versions on cache miss if debug is on: https://github.com/actions/toolkit/blob/main/packages/cache/src/internal/cacheHttpClient.ts#L132 Closing this issue

@bethanyj28 seems to be releasing latest version. They might help get this on someone's radar.

> Caching system dependencies installed using `apt` is a a no brainer when it comes to use cases. If you have to run `sudo apt-get install ...` stands to reason...