IRV
IRV copied to clipboard
Miscounting of first votes
Candidates:
Ubers
Monotype
Random Battle
AAA
MnM
OU
Gen 3 OU
1v1
NU
RU
LC
UU
DOU
DUU
VGC 2017
Ballots (these are wrong but had to put them in like this to test past #4):
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 2, 11, 12, 1, 3, 4, 5, 13, 14, 15
13, 14, 3, 6, 15, 12, 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Should give:
Ubers: 1
Monotype: 0
Random Battle: 0
AAA: 0
MnM: 0
OU: 1
Gen 3 OU: 0
1v1: 0
NU: 0
RU: 0
LC: 0
UU: 0
DOU: 1
DUU: 0
VGC 2017: 0
But it actually gives:
Ubers: 1
Monotype: 0
Random Battle: 0
AAA: 0
MnM: 0
OU: 0
Gen 3 OU: 1
1v1: 0
NU: 1
RU: 0
LC: 0
UU: 0
DOU: 0
DUU: 0
VGC 2017: 0
You may need to resubmit the results to reproduce this bug.
Thanks for reporting this, but it looks fine to me:
_1, _2, _3, _4, _5, _6, _7, _8, _9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 <- Ubers is first _6, _7, _8, _9, 10, _2, 11, 12, _1, _3, _4, _5, 13, 14, 15 <- NU is first 13, 14, _3, _6, 15, 12, _1, _2, _4, _5, _7, _8, _9, 10, 11 <- Gen 3 OU is first
(underscores just for spacing, bold for 'first votes')
I know that ballot input is unfortunately counterintuitive, because it is optimized for manual data entry. :(
I can explain in more detail if you like.
maybe the explanation in #1 helps. I'm still looking for concrete improvement suggestions.