security-scripts
security-scripts copied to clipboard
check for import with a single try
Thanks for the PR - however, it's the idea that the user gets a nice error message if the import goes awry. What would be the advantage of removing that statement?
I have not removed that statement. And you are right, for some reason it seems like that but if you look at my fork, it's not removed. I have just removed the double check for the imports, which seems unnecessary.
Any update on this? As mentioned earlier, the error message is still there.
Thanks for the ping ;) -I agree on removing the double unnecessary try block. However, I do think there's value in showing a "nice" error message instead of the default one. Would you mind amending your PR with keeping the nice message? Thanks!
Do you have any suggestions? I think asking the user to install packages using requirements.txt
, if the they haven't already, should be good enough. It would be tedious and unnecessary for the user to install packages one by one, as mentioned in the current error message.