PatrickHaecker

> 🙈 But now it's not storing the code visible/hidden status... Need to rethink this I think the code visible/hidden status needs to be shifted to the cell itself with...

I am using Julia 1.12.1. The warning is probably printed by Julia itself when the [cmd compiling the system image](https://github.com/JuliaLang/PackageCompiler.jl/blob/c1e37c44f591a35681437c2ff6fcb428b40ed528/src/PackageCompiler.jl#L541) is run. According to the [release announcement from GNU ld...

For clarification: I suspect some sort of single-sign-on to temporarily request something, which is detected as out-of-scope, but which I can't see in the browser's URL.

Thanks for the proposal. This mitigates the first problem. This way, however, everyone with these uses cases needs an auxiliary module or we need two packages instead of one, which...

It does not matter too much. It's only a bit confusing that types like `Int255` can be defined in any module with `EmulatedBitIntegers.jl` and types like `Int256` are always defined...

Ah, understood, good point. I just checked and I think the proposal is worded in a balanced way: > If the major version number is increased, please consider to drop...

Hi Lukas, thanks a lot for the information, which makes it much clearer how we came to the current solution. Let me also give you some background to have an...

This is a very interesting feature and surely useful in some situations. However, I have doubts, too, that it should be active by default. The way I understand it, you...

> `add` already adds packages that are consistent with the current environment > add and up will become much more distinct after this PR Good points, so we already won't...