Carlos Parada

> > Could we change the name LowDiscrepancySample for HaltonSample? > > I find it very confusing, as Low Discrepency is a generic term used to define all QMC sequences....

> > With regards to names, I actually think we should drop Sample from all the types; it's 6 extra letters but contains 0 new information. > > It can...

Another suggestion--maybe it's better to use `pointset` or a similar name instead of `sample`? Partly this is so it doesn't conflict with `sample`, since not exporting `sample` is annoying for...

@dcarrera Just wanted to ask about this because you opened [an issue](https://github.com/stevengj/Sobol.jl/issues/31) about it in Sobol.jl. Would you be interested in making a pull request implementing your suggested interface here...

@ChrisRackauckas do you think you or someone else could make a draft PR to Surrogates.jl to swap to the "iterator over points" interface? Now that `eachcol` makes it easy to...

If @thazhemadam wants to talk on Slack about this I’d be happy to.

Looks like someone forgot to make a new release after the last merge? @nalimilan could you make one?

It's worth noting that in addition to sparse arrays, [FillArrays](https://github.com/JuliaArrays/FillArrays.jl) has been using the efficient/pure implementation for a long time now, and I'm definitely wary of a diverging standard from...

> I've commented at [JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#4 (comment)](https://github.com/JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl/issues/4#issuecomment-1043459644). > > TBH I doubt the `pure=false` default could create any bugs, as doing `map(x -> x^2 + rand(), A)` and assuming purity is...

> > I don't think it can cause any _true_ bugs > > We added this functionality because of the bugs reported by users. > > However, I know that...