Gavin John
Gavin John
Can Repro: 
I've submitted a PR at https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/14233. It got locked by mistake though.
I believe so.
Personally, I wouldn't approve it because the standard would have to be brought up to current EIP formatting (and that involves non-normal changes). Alternatively, this could be manually merged. @MicahZoltu...
> I have not changed any text or normative things. I think you have normative vs non-normative flipped around: Normative: the meaning is unchanged. Non-normative: the meaning is changed. The...
Sorry, let me be a bit more specific: Some of the changes required by eipw here _require_ non-normative changes to the spec.
ERC also needs to be replaced with EIP.
> 173 is FINAL, I lean towards follow IETF RFC approach to create a new EIP that "updates" EIP-165 This doesn't introduce any backward incompatibilities and is therefore fine.
> This PR does not touch any mention of "ERC" or "EIP". `eipw` still requires that you fix the instances.
> I suggest EIPW to be updated so that it only check modified lines rather than full file. If the effort to bring an EIP up to date is not...