PaddiM8
PaddiM8
I'm trying to decide how to deal with the different kinds of multiplication operations with vectors. The Wolfram language seems to do the following: * `*` for element-wise multiplication, eg....
I have now implemented basic support for vectors/matrices. Vectors are defined like `(1, 2, 3)` or `[1, 2, 3]`. You can do addition, subtraction, division, multiplication and power with another...
Haven't heard of this before but looks neat
@darcy-shen You should be able to do `kalker f(x)=x; f(1)`and `kalker -i /path/to/a/kalker/file` actually!
Not sure why the circumflex would be deleted. I can't reproduce that on my machine. However, I now made sure a⋅⋅b gets parsed as a^b in the latest commit.
Something more visible would be good, but hm, it's tricky to make it work well. Your suggestion actually looks better than I had imagined it before, so maybe that's an...
Neat, didn't know that was a thing in maths. Hopefully it isn't too awkward to parse. I guess "if function names are used inside a group (parenthesis), expect an argument...
This would be very convenient! However, wouldn't it get confusing when it comes to subtraction? A minus sign at the start could just be a negative number. ```julia >> 1+2...
Hmm these options seem a bit unintuitive, but I do agree that this would be very convenient. Good point with the numpad as well, it would be good find a...
This is super odd. Seems to only happen to some Linux users. Someone with a very very similar setup to mine had this problem, while I didn't. Most likely a...