Paul O'Neill
Paul O'Neill
There's [a Google groups mailing list](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/sonarqube) you can try posting in, last I heard was 'this year'.
None yet - I'm holding fire until it's clearer what's going on with the SonarSource plugin (nothing seems yet to be released). I don't want to invest a bunch of...
I'd not lift their descriptions without asking permission, but we would also need to make a change to support reading HTML files for rule descriptions from disk either way. Easiest...
Thanks, will take a look at the PR - it might also address #149 actually...
Trying to find time, work + impending fatherhood consuming most of it - will try and sneak a merge and pre-release in this weekend but if you're in a rush...
Yeah so I think you're right that the change there would sort what you want, but I'd want to see how I could config SonarQube to still analyse and report...
Cool, thanks for the background
Well I would like to do something to support the situation, I'm just not sure what a good fix looks like. At the minute, I'm thinking a ```sonar.ts.tslint.excludeTests``` setting (default:...
No - you still need to specify what a test is via the standard sonar.tests property, as that's what SQ's using to give correct overall project coverage (and also what...
You should be able to use the inbuilt ```sonar.coverage.exclusions``` property for that: https://docs.sonarqube.org/display/SONAR/Analysis+Parameters#AnalysisParameters-Exclusions/Inclusions Though number-of-lines won't be affected by that, the coverage percentage shouldn't take it into account (I believe...)