Parth Nobel
Parth Nobel
That sounds like a great first step. I think I agree with h-vetenari in another thread that we should release 1.5.2 with NumPy 2.0 support before 2.0 comes out. That'll...
I want to make sure that the cvxpy-base build is working before merging... Rerunning CI, since the error seemed spurious
Upgrading to Swig 4.1.1 was quite intentional. I don't think we should backout https://github.com/cvxpy/cvxpy/pull/2273
Looks good to me
Would #2450 work for your purpose?
Stephen said we should call it a "solver path" in the documentation; he also suggested making it a keyword argument to `.solve` instead of a new public function (maybe `.solve(path=[...])`....
> I’m not sure about “path” as a keyword argument. I’d be in favor of “solver_path” or “solver_priority” for keyword arguments to prob.solve. Fair! I don't like solver_priority since we...
I think that should raise a runtime error.
I like this PR with Oriya's changes. Since this is a change to the public API, let's get maintainer consensus on this proposal before writing the new docs and merging.
This does needs some docs. Certainly it should be added to the .solve docstring and added to this page: https://www.cvxpy.org/tutorial/solvers/index.html Maybe as a new section title "Solver paths" that discusses...