Thomas Schouten

Yeah I don't know how they manage to do that, but we can have another look for general performance improvements. Note to self: check if `indexSinkOccurrence` has performance implications

#3147 partially fixes this, but not completely. You can already try https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/download?rel=true&updateId=357446

That does sounds like a different issue than this one, but to be sure, it would be really helpful if you could upload a visualvm snapshot as described here: https://hannah-sten.github.io/TeXiFy-IDEA/troubleshooting.html#debugging-performance-issues...

I believe this was fixed by #3147

I'm not sure what you mean that it would achieve, if I add those to my path PyCharm still won't recognise Sage's python as correct. But it sounds like a...

@NavyAdmiral Are you also trying to find a proper IDE for Sage on Windows? Actually this issue was raised while trying to get Sage to work using PyCharm, but when...

> I want to get Sage Intellisense (suggestions, autocompletion, ...) in VSCode. Yup, that's what I meant. Would be great if you could let people know if you succeeded, when...

Not sure if this is possible, do you have any idea how they determine scopes? Don't see anything in the intellij sdk docs yet about sticky lines

I asked at jetbrains slack channel and Scott Wells replied: > It's all based on the breadcrumbsInfoProvider EP. Implement that properly for your language, and the elements included in the...

Yeah I guess that's the only way it can determine the scope. I don't see an easy way to add sectioning commands to the parser without breaking a lot of...