PF4Public

Results 469 comments of PF4Public
trafficstars

So, merging this one next, then?

> I’m using the Linux version on my custom hardware open suse computer Does it have [Intel Management Engine](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine#Assertions_that_ME_is_a_backdoor) or [AMD Secure Technology](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Platform_Security_Processor#Reported_vulnerabilities) or [ARM TrustZone](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture_family#Security_extensions:~:text=In%20practice%2C%20since%20the%20specific%20implementation%20details%20of%20proprietary%20TrustZone%20implementations%20have%20not%20been%20publicly%20disclosed%20for%20review%2C%20it%20is%20unclear%20what%20level%20of%20assurance%20is%20provided%20for%20a%20given%20threat%20model%2C%20but%20they%20are%20not%20immune%20from%20attack.)? Just some starting points...

This is an old issue, that didn't show much activity recently and probably lost its significance — closing. If you have any more information to add, let us know.

This is an old issue, that didn't show much activity recently — closing. If you have any more information to add, let us know.

@networkException @clickot Should we insist on correctly filled `github_author` field?

> Can you please help me seeing what is going wrong here ? Chromium is attempting to build itself against libstdc++, but it is know to be a problem since...

> There are plenty of resources available, including dedicated systems building codebases just as large as Chromium, if not larger. I wonder if you consider publishing your binaries at https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium-binaries

@JerryCasiano As of now, is wip-gtk4 branch usable or still largely experimental?

@JerryCasiano Are databases compatible? Should one have a testing one for wip-gtk4 and a separate one for normal version?