Maciej

@Ank4n > Is it possible to move most of the disabling logic to pallet_session? (assuming we want to do this) I will discuss if this is a good idea later...

@Ank4n > I wouldn't try to block you if you want to go ahead with this PR, especially since most of the things I flagged should ideally had been flagged...

Added all the defensive suggestions from @Ank4n Good eye for spotting them, thanks! > Could you check if its possible to get rid of the storage item DisabledValidators in pallet-staking...

Tests in CI failed on [test-linux-stable (1/3, parity-large-persistent)](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/actions/runs/11896057400/job/33147184815#logs): ``` FLAKY 4/6 [ 31.550s] pallet-revive-eth-rpc tests::deploy_and_call FLAKY 2/6 [ 0.107s] polkadot-dispute-distribution tests::send_dispute_gets_cleaned_up FLAKY 2/6 [ 126.884s] polkadot-node-core-pvf::it execute_job_terminates_on_timeout TRY 6 FAIL...

Gav recently called parachains cynical rollups during one of the recent keynotes. I agree there is some merit to it and I also like reminding people that our parachains are...

If it is not a matter of a rename but just an alternative terminology then I think this is much more easily doable. Parachain AKA parallel parachain is a pretty...

> Being disabled stops nodes from initiating a dispute (hard escalation) Hope this part is clear. It means that an honest validator node when receiving a dispute statement from a...

With the merge of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5724 we have moved to stage 3 and works is being started on the stage 4 implementation. Stage 3 in short prioritizes highest offenders instead of...