OrchardCore icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
OrchardCore copied to clipboard

GraphQL Breaks on Orchard Core Version 2.0.2 When Querying Multiple termContentItems

Open vikasmahant69 opened this issue 1 year ago • 2 comments

Description

GraphQL queries involving termContentItems are breaking in Orchard Core version 2.0.2 when attempting to fetch multiple records, whereas these same queries were working as expected in version 1.8.3. This issue specifically arises when trying to fetch multiple records of termContentItems in relation to other properties.

Orchard Core version 2.0.2

To Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behaviour:

  1. Create a GraphQL query fetching any contentItems and its termContentItems.
  2. The query breaks if multiple records for termContentItems are present.

Below is an example of a breaking query: query MyQuery { exhibitor { name filterTags { termContentItems { displayText } } } }

Expected behavior

The query should return all records of termContentItems along with the associated name and filterTags for the exhibitor.

Additional Information

The query works fine when fetching only a single record. Example of a working query that limits the result set:

query MyQuery { exhibitor(first: 10) { name filterTags { termContentItems { displayText } } } }

Notes:

The issue did not exist in version 1.8.3, where the same query returned multiple records without any problem. This suggests a regression or breaking change in version 2.0.2 that affects the handling of multiple termContentItems in GraphQL queries.

Potential Impact:

Users cannot reliably query multiple termContentItems in GraphQL. This affects any Orchard Core instances that have upgraded from 1.8.3 to 2.0.2 and rely on similar GraphQL queries for their functionality.

Logs and screenshots

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/18fbbf8e-c9e2-4aea-90df-c2f56e145148

vikasmahant69 avatar Oct 14 '24 10:10 vikasmahant69

Extracted the stack trace

image

sebastienros avatar Oct 17 '24 17:10 sebastienros

We triaged this issue and set the milestone according to the priority we think is appropriate (see the docs on how we triage and prioritize issues).

This indicates when the core team may start working on it. However, if you'd like to contribute, we'd warmly welcome you to do that anytime. See our guide on contributions here.

github-actions[bot] avatar Oct 17 '24 17:10 github-actions[bot]

I quickly tried to reproduce this error with the blog theme, but it works flawlessly with the latest main. Could you share your content definitions?

gvkries avatar Nov 19 '24 12:11 gvkries

It seems that this issue didn't really move for quite a while despite us asking the author for further feedback. Is this something you'd like to revisit any time soon or should we close? Please reply.

github-actions[bot] avatar Dec 04 '24 12:12 github-actions[bot]

Closing this issue because it didn't receive further feedback from the author for very long. If you think this is still relevant, feel free to reopen it with the requested details.

github-actions[bot] avatar Dec 11 '24 12:12 github-actions[bot]