OrchardCMS
Add Blazor guide for decoupled cms.
That's a lot of steps and explanations. Some of the code snippets seem to be created by the project templates.
That's a good starting point but I really meant like creating an Orchard Core module that would use Blazor. Probably a second module that includes at least one Blazor component example. Here, it's a Nuget package solution sample.
That's a lot of steps and explanations. Some of the code snippets seem to be created by the project templates.
I agree, to have code generation templates for orchard + blazor to cover scenario's like decoupled, headless, OC auth with open id.
Currently working with OC using Microsoft's provided blazor templates requires lot of changes that could lead to errors. Also Microsoft doesn't have any template for blazor app in razor classlibrary, so I felt like it would be clean to provide step by step guide to work with OC
Yeah, ok so it doesn't Fixes https://github.com/OrchardCMS/OrchardCore/issues/15068 please remove. You can create a different issue though named something like "Create Blazor Nuget Package solution sample/guide".
Could it be simpler by not duplicating exactly the aspnet sample with all these css files to copy? Wouldn't a simple ref to bootstrap or any public css work for a demo?
Sure we could! But I felt to use aspnet sample is more relevant and simple for new user who is aware of aspnet sample and can co-relate OC easier on how to use it as razorclasslib
Edit:
After the meeting today (2024-03-19), I discovered 2 more ways to retrieve the base url. I refactored and renamed.
I will try to write a little walk through as addition to this PR?
I made a little step toward multi tenancy. Things can be smarter. Use of Menu would be nice. Site settings. Auth/Roles Happy to receive feedback and add to this guide if relevant.
@ns8482e Could you give me back the url where you did the Orchard Core module with a Blazor Web Component with the OptionEditor? I lost the discussion.
Walkthrough
Walkthrough
This update introduces a comprehensive guide on integrating Orchard CMS with a .NET Blazor application in a decoupled architecture. It involves setting up both the CMS and the Blazor app, enabling them to work together seamlessly. The guide covers the entire process from project setup to adding interactive content and supporting multi-tenancy, providing a robust foundation for developers looking to leverage Orchard CMS with Blazor technology.
Changes
| File Path | Change Summary |
|---|---|
mkdocs.yml |
Added a new guide for creating a Decoupled CMS site with .NET Blazor (Server Side) to the navigation. |
src/docs/guides/.../README.md |
Introduced a new comprehensive guide detailing the integration of Orchard CMS with a .NET Blazor application, covering setup, development, and interactivity enhancements. |
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
-
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>. -
Generate unit testing code for this file. -
Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
-
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:-
@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file. -
@coderabbitai modularize this function.
-
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:-
@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. -
@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository. -
@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code. -
@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format. -
@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
-
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
-
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR. -
@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews. -
@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. -
@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. -
@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR. -
@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. -
@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. -
@coderabbitai helpto get help.
Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)
- You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a
.coderabbit.yamlfile to the root of your repository. - Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
- If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation:
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
Documentation and Community
- Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
![coderabbitai[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
This pull request has merge conflicts. Please resolve those before requesting a review.
![github-actions[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
@ns8482e Can you please fix the conflict and see the coderabbit's suggestions?
It seems that this pull request didn't really move for quite a while. Is this something you'd like to revisit any time soon or should we close? Please comment if you'd like to pick it up.