Upgrade generic-template to polkadot-stable2503

[4meta5]

WIP Closes #411

Repo/Forks to Upgrade

• [x] dancekit, branch = polkadot-stable2503
• [x] moonkit, branch = polkadot-stable2503
• [x] open runtime module library, branch = polkadot-stable2503
• [x] moonbeam, branch = polkadot-stable2503
• [x] pallet abstractions, branch = polkadot-stable2503

TODO

• [ ] (WIP) runtime compilation
• [ ] node compilation
• [ ] CI green

[netlify[bot]]

✅ Deploy Preview for docs-oz-polkadot canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	b336c012749630a4cb0feeabd1f1290165ae81a9
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/docs-oz-polkadot/deploys/685c18957aeaca00072fdafa

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 10.52632% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 78.54%. Comparing base (9875363) to head (b336c01). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...template/runtime/src/configs/governance/origins.rs	0.00%	11 Missing :warning:
...neric-template/runtime/src/configs/asset_config.rs	0.00%	3 Missing :warning:
generic-template/runtime/src/configs/xcm_config.rs	0.00%	2 Missing :warning:
generic-template/runtime/src/types.rs	0.00%	1 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #414      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.88%   78.54%   -0.34%     
==========================================
  Files          17       17              
  Lines        2145     2153       +8     
  Branches     2145     2153       +8     
==========================================
- Hits         1692     1691       -1     
- Misses        390      399       +9     
  Partials       63       63              

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:

• :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[4meta5]

The coverage generation is indicating that more coverage needs to be added but the added lines come from the new requirement to derive DecodeWithMemTracking for all structs stored in storage which led to the derive annotation being too long to fit in one line. So I do not think it is really necessary or valuable to add tests for that specific change. I'm not sure what tests would be added anyway to satisfy the line split.

@KitHat let me know your thoughts on this, I do not think the coverage generation passing is a requirement for merging.