Draft for discussion: Feature/add elements to detection classification

[FlorianMueller87]

Reference to a related issue in the repository

#643

Add a description

ASAM OSI and ISO 23150 or AUTOSAR ADI have a common history. Unfortunately, the inner structure, the naming and the definitions of the standards are differentiated from each other. This makes the work of developers unnecessary complicated for mostly no technical reasons. All sides should strive to reduce inequality.

ASAM OSI need the entries for osi_featuredata – DetectionClassification to be compatible with AUTOSAR ADI DetectionClassificationType.

Take this checklist as orientation for yourself, if this PR is ready for the Change Control Board:

• [x] My suggestion follows the style and contributors guidelines.
• [x] I have taken care about the documentation.
• [x] I have done the DCO signoff.
• [x] My changes generate no errors when passing CI tests.
• [ ] I have successfully implemented and tested my fix/feature locally.
• [ ] Appropriate reviewer(s) are assigned.

Describe alternatives you have considered

No alternative was considered.

Describe the backwards compatibility

The adding of the elements will not lead to backward compatibility issues. Additional context

ISO23150:2021 A.4.14 Detection classification type

@ThomasNaderBMW @jdsika @schmidtlorenz

[jdsika]

NEAREST and STRONGEST seem to be parameters for the search of objekts. It is completely different to define something as UNDERDRIVABLE or as NEAREST. Something can be CLUTTER and at the same time be the NEAREST. Please clarify why the ISO did define it like this @carsten-kuebler ?