openspp-modules add gender data and educational level selections

Why is this change needed?

To not install spp_base_demo when spp_farmer_registry_demo is installed.
To fix the problem with the Highest Educational Level.

How was the change implemented?

Removed spp_base_demo on spp_farmer_registry_demo depends, and add gender data xml.
Added the same selection values from res_partner to spp_farmer.

New unit tests

None

Unit tests executed by the author

None

How to test manually

Install spp_farmer_registry_demo on new instance or make sure spp_base_demo is not installed by uninstalling spp_farmer_registry_demo first.

Test 1

Check if spp_base_demo is installed (should not be installed automatically).

Test 2

Go to Configuration > Gender Types.
Check if Male and Female are existing in the Gender Types.

Test 3

Go to Group > Select or Open one.
Check if Farmer Highest Educational Level selections is the same with Individual's Highest Educational Level.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 73.23%. Comparing base (c2d1b67) to head (098063e). Report is 7 commits behind head on 17.0.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             17.0     #617      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.50%   73.23%   -0.28%     
==========================================
  Files         560      544      -16     
  Lines       14084    13623     -461     
  Branches     1799     1750      -49     
==========================================
- Hits        10353     9977     -376     
+ Misses       3414     3348      -66     
+ Partials      317      298      -19

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Oct 04 '24 02:10 codecov[bot]

TEST 1: Upon checking spp_base_demo is installed (should not be installed automatically). spp_base_demo was only installed after adding spp_farmer_registry_demo. Regarding this, @reichie020212 @Markpenalosa should this be the expected? In the HOW TO TEST MANUALLY is was specified that: