open-fixture-library icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
open-fixture-library copied to clipboard

Add fixture 'stairville/par-56-mkii-rgba-w'

Open FloEdelmann opened this issue 3 years ago • 2 comments

  • Add fixture 'stairville/par-56-mkii-rgba-w'

Thank you José!

FloEdelmann avatar Feb 24 '22 19:02 FloEdelmann

Export files validity

(Output of test script tests/github/exports-valid.js.)

Test the exported files of selected fixtures against the plugins' export tests. You can run a plugin's export tests by executing: $ node cli/run-export-test.js -p <plugin name> <fixtures>

:heavy_check_mark: stairville / par-56-mkii-rgba-w: d-light / attributes-correctness
  • :heavy_check_mark: stairville/par-56-mkii-rgba-w-4ch.xml
  • :heavy_check_mark: stairville/par-56-mkii-rgba-w-6ch.xml
  • :heavy_check_mark: stairville/par-56-mkii-rgba-w-8ch.xml
:heavy_check_mark: stairville / par-56-mkii-rgba-w: dmxcontrol3 / channel-numbers
  • :heavy_check_mark: stairville-par-56-mkii-rgba-w-4ch.xml
  • :heavy_check_mark: stairville-par-56-mkii-rgba-w-6ch.xml
  • :heavy_check_mark: stairville-par-56-mkii-rgba-w-8ch.xml
:heavy_check_mark: stairville / par-56-mkii-rgba-w: dragonframe / json-schema-conformity
  • :heavy_check_mark: stairville/par-56-mkii-rgba-w.json
  • :heavy_check_mark: manufacturers.json
:heavy_check_mark: stairville / par-56-mkii-rgba-w: millumin / json-schema-conformity
  • :heavy_check_mark: stairville/par-56-mkii-rgba-w.json
:heavy_check_mark: stairville / par-56-mkii-rgba-w: qlcplus_4.12.2 / fixture-tool-validation
  • :heavy_check_mark: fixtures/Stairville-PAR-56-MKII-RGBAW.qxf
:heavy_check_mark: stairville / par-56-mkii-rgba-w: qlcplus_4.12.2 / xsd-schema-conformity
  • :heavy_check_mark: fixtures/Stairville-PAR-56-MKII-RGBAW.qxf

github-actions[bot] avatar Feb 24 '22 19:02 github-actions[bot]

See also #2435.

FloEdelmann avatar Feb 27 '22 10:02 FloEdelmann

@FloEdelmann There is some crazy switch channel magic happening in this fixture. I've added some helpWanted items where I'm not sure. I hope I've done the rest correctly. Please could you double check?

Edit: No, it doesn't seem happy with re-using the 'NoFunction' capability multiple times in different switching channels.

luc122c avatar Feb 11 '23 12:02 luc122c

Edit: No, it doesn't seem happy with re-using the 'NoFunction' capability multiple times in different switching channels.

It seems like #222 would be a good solution to this.

luc122c avatar Feb 12 '23 21:02 luc122c