Add `industrial technology` and `industrial plant`
Summary of the discussion
Describe the findings of the discussion in the issue or meeting.
Type of change (CHANGELOG.md)
Add
- Added a new class #
Update
- Updated a definition #
Remove
- Removed a broken link #
Workflow checklist
Automation
Closes #1726
PR-Assignee
- [ ] 🐙 Follow the Pull Request Workflow
- [ ] 📝 Update the CHANGELOG.md
- [ ] 📙 Add #'s to
term tracker item
Reviewer
- [ ] 🐙 Follow the Reviewer Guide
- [ ] 🐙 Provided feedback and show sufficient appreciation for the work done
What is the state of this PR? Can you finish it until the release @l-emele?
What is the state of this PR? Can you finish it until the release @l-emele?
I don't think so. My implementation has led to some inconsistencies (see failing CI run). The problem is that classes introduced at different stages do not align, see issue discussion. I don't see a quick fix for this.
I implemented the industry technology axiom wrong and that is why the CI was failing. I fixed this and it is now working again.
However, I want to discuss some further things related to the industry classes, see issue #1726.
@stap-m : I think I've implemented everything as discussed today. So this PR is now (again) ready for review.