Annotation OEO_00140170 shows not properly in oeo-physical

[l-emele]

Description of the issue

Annotation OEO_00140170 shows not properly in oeo-physical, which means that it is used but not properly imported:

Ideas of solution

If you already have ideas for the solution describe them here

Workflow checklist

• [ ] I discussed the issue with someone else than me before working on a solution
• [ ] I already read the latest version of the workflow for this repository
• [ ] The goal of this ontology is clear to me

I am aware that

• [ ] every entry in the ontology should have a definition
• [ ] classes should arise from concepts rather than from words

[l-emele]

OEO_00140170 is the annotation property has documentation quality. It is implemented in oeo-model and has a domain of model.

It shows up in oeo-physical only when opening oeo.omn first and then switching to oeo-physical. When opening oeo-physical directly, OEO_00140170 does not show up. So this seems not to be a problem of the OEO but instead a bug in Protégé.

[stap-m]

Well spotted. I can reproduce the bug.

Reading the definition, I think OEO_00140170 should be a data property, instead. Annotation properties are used to annotate oeo entities, not models.

[stap-m]

Reading the definition, I think OEO_00140170 should be a data property, instead. Annotation properties are used to annotate oeo entities, not models.

Any comments? We should fix this rather soon.

[l-emele]

So we convert this to a data property? I am fine with that.