Axiomatise `storage unit`

[l-emele]

Description of the issue

We have the class storage unit that is currently defined as: A storage unit is a grid component that stores energy. This definition is not axiomatised.

Ideas of solution

Axiomatise the energy storage function

• either by a normal axiom 'storage unit' 'has function' some 'energy storage'
• or make it an equivalent class 'storage unit' EquivalentTo: 'grid component' and 'has function' some 'energy storage'

Workflow checklist

• [ ] I discussed the issue with someone else than me before working on a solution
• [ ] I already read the latest version of the workflow for this repository
• [ ] The goal of this ontology is clear to me

I am aware that

• [ ] every entry in the ontology should have a definition
• [ ] classes should arise from concepts rather than from words

[l-emele]

From OEO Dev 46:

Make it an equivalent class: 'storage unit' EquivalentTo: 'grid component' and 'has function' some 'energy storage'

[l-emele]

Discussed today in OEO dev 46. PR #1348 will solve this issue completely.