openapi-style-validator
openapi-style-validator copied to clipboard
added new api module for creating custom rules and moved error classes to new module
This is the first to attempt improve the validation tool to be more extensible and customisable as discussed in https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-style-validator/issues/347 and https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-style-validator/pull/388. I will create series logical PR to port the existing rule validation into the new design.
@JFCote , I created this PR against the master branch. But I would prefer to create new branch such as V2.0 where we merge all the PR's related to this new design. Once we ported all the rules into new design, then we can merge this into master branch. Any other suggestion?
I will check this next week!
@thiyagu06 I'm terribly sorry, been busy like hell these days. I didn't forget about you. Will try to check this very soon.
@thiyagu06 I'm terribly sorry, been busy like hell these days. I didn't forget about you. Will try to check this very soon.
np @JFCote . No need to hurry. Take your time 😃
I created this PR against the master branch. But I would prefer to create new branch such as V2.0 where we merge all the PR's related to this new design. Once we ported all the rules into new design, then we can merge this into master branch. Any other suggestion?
Yes I think it should be against a new feature branch. Let's call it v2.0
. I will create it. Can you change your PR and move it to this new branch?
I created this PR against the master branch. But I would prefer to create new branch such as V2.0 where we merge all the PR's related to this new design. Once we ported all the rules into new design, then we can merge this into master branch. Any other suggestion?
Yes I think it should be against a new feature branch. Let's call it
v2.0
. I will create it. Can you change your PR and move it to this new branch?
Yes.. It's done.
I will look into the comments in the next week.
@JFCote , sorry for the delay as I held up with other things. I fixed the review comments. Let me know if we can go ahead to merge this and port all the current rule into this new structure.