Fix long running test
Depending on test exec environment, this test could linger around for ~8 minutes, b/c pinging test.com will not resolve and run into several timeouts.
Brings down CI time for Linux Suite from >10m to ~4m.
Before
Connections in this test time out with
java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out: connect
After
Connection fails immediately with
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect
PR checklist
- [x] Read the contribution guidelines.
- [x] Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
- [ ] Run the following to build the project and update samples:
(For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH) Commit all changed files. This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master. These must match the expectations made by your contribution. You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example./mvnw clean package ./bin/generate-samples.sh ./bin/configs/*.yaml ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*. IMPORTANT: Do NOT purge/delete any folders/files (e.g. tests) when regenerating the samples as manually written tests may be removed. - [x] File the PR against the correct branch:
master(upcoming 7.6.0 minor release - breaking changes with fallbacks),8.0.x(breaking changes without fallbacks) - [ ] If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.
@wing328 Reviewers and contributors are going to like this :)
Unfortunately Windows and CircleCI checks are still far >10m, however this helps with time needed for local test suite execution.
nice. thanks for the PR.
for windows, we can improve that with another PR later.
for windows, we can improve that with another PR later.
@wing328 i checked the actions' log, the test in question also fails quickly as expected there – however the total runtime of the windows actions is still high. Wondering how that could be optimized though.