[BUG] [C++][Pistache] cpp-pistache-server generating API include unde…
…fined "Object.h" (#2769)
Should handle Object.h, AnyType.h correctly. Set.h also tested.
- #include Object.h removed and replaced by a typeMapping.put(object, nlohmann::json) like suggested in other issues
- object had an invalid syntax: ':' instead of '::' in types with namespace
- extra include of #include nlohmann/json.h removed when there's already #include <nlohmann/json.hpp>
- nlohmann::json is excluded from model namespace
Tested with custom petstore played, with suggested openapi specs coming from issues #2769, #10266, #14234
rm -rf samples/server/petstore/cpp-pistache-everything/ && ./bin/generate-samples.sh ./bin/configs/cpp-pistache-server-cpp-pistache-everything.yaml && cd samples/server/petstore/cpp-pistache-everything/ && mkdir build && cd build && cmake .. && cmake --build . --parallel
PR checklist
- [x] Read the contribution guidelines.
- [x] Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
- [x] Run the following to build the project and update samples:
(For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH) Commit all changed files. This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master. These must match the expectations made by your contribution. You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example./mvnw clean package ./bin/generate-samples.sh ./bin/configs/*.yaml ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*. IMPORTANT: Do NOT purge/delete any folders/files (e.g. tests) when regenerating the samples as manually written tests may be removed. - [x] File the PR against the correct branch:
master(upcoming 7.1.0 minor release - breaking changes with fallbacks),8.0.x(breaking changes without fallbacks) - [x] If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.
thanks for the PR.
suggestion (optional): what about adding a github work under ./github/worfklows to test samples/server/petstore/cpp-pistache-everything to ensure the output compiles? (or do it in another PR instead)
please commit the new files in samples/server/petstore/cpp-pistache-everything/ when you've time
-
I've sent the content of
samples/server/petstore/cpp-pistache-everything. -
I didn't find a
cpp-pistacheworkflow in the.github/workflowsfolder to take it for example to create a workflow forcpp-pistache-everything. If would be safer if I can start from it.
But they are others issues to correct in the C++ pistache generator, and I continue correcting them using samples/server/petstore/cpp-pistache-everything for that. I wish its yaml to carry the most different declarations it can.
As soon I will have enough knowledge to declare a workflow for it, I will, when submitting a next PR.
please update the new sample one more time: https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator/actions/runs/8933887779/job/24547007194?pr=18553
./bin/utils/ensure-up-to-date returns "Git working tree is clean" locally now.
thanks for the PR. let's give it a try