GlanceReader icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
GlanceReader copied to clipboard

WPM Inaccurate?

Open ztbrown opened this issue 12 years ago • 3 comments

I feel like WPM is inaccurate. This is just anecdotal, but I'm getting through a book much slower than expected.

How do we currently test the WPM?

ztbrown avatar Apr 06 '14 21:04 ztbrown

You're probably right, and we don't have a test case for WPM yet.

The wrinkle in this problem is that certain words have increased delay for readability, and we display three blank "words" following each end-of-sentence punctuation.

Determining appropriate probabilities for these situations and scaling the displayed WPM could be a viable improvement. e.g: Say we determine a 600 WPM setpoint corresponds to a realized 500 WPM with average sentence and word length. Developing a test case to help determine this scaling value would be cool, but I don't have time atm.

OnlyInAmerica avatar Apr 06 '14 21:04 OnlyInAmerica

Had the same feeling, while reading a book. I set up a unit-test (locally) with some article from a newspaper.

Results: 600 WPM in the setting was just about 240 measured. 500 WPM in the setting was just about 200 measured.

Not sure the test ist currect, yet. Going to look over it the next days.

Matschile avatar May 01 '14 21:05 Matschile

I can confirm this. There are tons of delays for everything.

arpheno avatar May 15 '14 09:05 arpheno