olf

I failed to upload the source TS-file in about 30 tries with Firefox 78ESR and Chromium (which was worse than Firefox to my surprise). @b100dian & @nephros: Can one of...

> > I failed to upload the source TS-file in about 30 tries with FF78ESR and Chromium (which was worse to my surprise). @b100dian & @nephros: Can one of you...

> You may want to consider merging this, https://github.com/nephros/patchmanager/tree/l10n-fix, I removed the fancy plural use and separate it into two strings, so we don't run into that issue again. Even...

My first, intuitive notion was "yes", but I have never analysed what the booster does in detail (some preloading of libraries, IIRC), hence I cannot tell if this is *necessary*....

@b100dian was missed.

Please let us carry out this meta-discussion at the oldest bug report filed by robang74: #444 Every thing discussed there an the meta-level is sure applicable to the filed issues...

> If the booster has been restarted once, activating and deactivating (or modifying the contents of) the patch does not need a restart. … but that is only because *you*...

I took my time, because it appears that you want another mind to check these considerations for correctness. 1. I think that *"PM library"*, *"preload library"*, *"the lib"*, *"the library"*...

Sorry that I cannot contribute to this, not even the discussion: It is beyond my current know-how and I lack the time to become more knowledgeable on this topic.

I suppose step 3 is a really rare case (borderline to artificial), but AFAIU your considerations are fully correct. Additionally step 4 "the user ignores the strong suggestion to restart...