redis-operator
redis-operator copied to clipboard
Clusters getting started is example is outdated in multiple places.
Which document needs to be updated? https://ot-redis-operator.netlify.app/docs/getting-started/cluster/
Expected changes Current yaml example there is
---
apiVersion: redis.redis.opstreelabs.in/v1beta1
kind: RedisCluster
metadata:
name: redis-cluster
spec:
clusterSize: 3
clusterVersion: v7
securityContext:
runAsUser: 1000
fsGroup: 1000
persistenceEnabled: true
kubernetesConfig:
image: quay.io/opstree/redis:v7.0.5
imagePullPolicy: Always
storage:
volumeClaimTemplate:
spec:
accessModes: ["ReadWriteOnce"]
resources:
requests:
storage: 1Gi
- v7.0.5 is not matching the latest version that is expected to be ran (according to other part of docs) which is v7.0.12
-
apiVersion: redis.redis.opstreelabs.in/v1beta1
is outdated and will fail with
Error from server: error when creating "redis.yaml": conversion webhook for redis.redis.opstreelabs.in/v1beta1, Kind=RedisCluster failed: Post "https://webhook-service.redis-operator.svc:443/convert?timeout=30s": service "webhook-service" not found
unless you are running in the same namespace as where the operator is (which often is not the case surely)
3. If you update to apiVersion: redis.redis.opstreelabs.in/v1beta1
to apiVersion: redis.redis.opstreelabs.in/v1beta2
one also needs to adjust securityContext
to podSecurityContext
as otherwise you will get
...
strict decoding error: unknown field "spec.securityContext"
- It would be much appreciated to outline that v7.0.5 or v7.0.12 will not work with ARM64 devices (entrypoint.sh can't be exec'd by this arch) and if the individual is to have hope here they should use latest tag.
What version of redis-operator are you using?
redis-operator version: 0.15.9
Additional context
I would appreciate re-deployment of the latest tag of quay.io/opstree/redis
with a version tag to allow people with arm64 devices to not have to stick with the ever changing latest tag. I realise this is not this repo's issue, I can raise it there if needs be.
Thank you so much for this issue, I was affected by exactly those issues and was scratching my head for a while
Thanks a lot for the details. You saved me a lot of time! This needs to be fixed urgently!
Here we use Flux2 and reconciliation failed because of :
securityContext:
...
fsGroup: 1000
This "field" does not exist in the API. After removing it from our kustomization, everything fell into place.