Alexander Mills

I have my own fs polyfill, just for reference, it's here: https://github.com/sumanjs/suman-browser-polyfills/blob/master/modules/fs.js I generated it by looping through all the fs methods and just allowing for both a synchronous return...

I tried it, and I get an error: ``` Invalid configuration object. Webpack has been initialised using a configuration object that does not match the API schema. - configuration.node['assert'] should...

@sokra would you accept a PR for this?

@jhnns thanks, not as far as I can tell - ``` Invalid configuration object. Webpack has been initialised using a configuration object that does not match the API schema. -...

I think browserify-fs or fs-browserify might be better? dunno. but definitely need an fs polyfill more than anything for most people

@diml that makes sense...Libuv is battle-tested now and an excellent piece of software that Node.js has been depending on for 7 years now. https://github.com/fdopen/uwt the above is an effort to...

If we load an unknown package.json dynamically (not part of the build) it would be nice to have a pessimistic structure of how the JSON should look after parsing, something...

also, it would be nice to be able to do this: ``` js //core const util = require('util'); //npm const ProgressBar = require('node-progress-bars'); const suman = require('suman'); //////////////////////////////////////// module.exports =...

I opened a ticket in July lol, waiting for a response :(

...