OPM
Well primaryvariable scaling
- make scaling of primary variables of wells
- scale control equation if it is bhp control Idea is to be able to make scaling of the matrices more normal. It is a follow up on the scaling of the reservoir primary variables.
Benchmark result overview:
| Test | Configuration | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| opm-git | OPM Benchmark: flow_mpi_extra - Threads: 1 | 1.004 |
| opm-git | OPM Benchmark: flow_mpi_extra - Threads: 8 | 0.998 |
| opm-git | OPM Benchmark: flow_mpi_norne - Threads: 1 | 0.999 |
| opm-git | OPM Benchmark: flow_mpi_norne - Threads: 8 | 0.991 |
| opm-git | OPM Benchmark: flow_mpi_norne_4c_msw - Threads: 1 | 0.997 |
| opm-git | OPM Benchmark: flow_mpi_norne_4c_msw - Threads: 8 | 0.996 |
- Speed-up = Total time master / Total time pull request. Above 1.0 is an improvement. *
View result details @ https://www.ytelses.com/opm/?page=result&id=1830
Do you have some ideas about what kind of number should be used to benefit a typical blackoil simulation running?
Should bhp_scaling and bhp_control_scaling be same or same order or something very different?
hei, one small thing is that, for the bhp_scaling, they are used to scale to reduce the values for the related primary variables through division, while for bhp_control_scaling, it is used to reduce the orders of the control_eq through multiplication. As a result, bhp_scaling will be a big value maybe in the order or bar level, while bhp_control_scaling will be a very small value.
Do you think it is easier to use if we can change this to make both bhp_scaling and bhp_control_scaling to be big values?