Flowhash livedev 5270 v1

[catenacyber]

Link to redmine ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/5270

Describe changes:

• flow: optionally use livedev for hash

Should it be optional ? Ie does suricata support having 2 interfaces monitoring the same network (and flows) ?

Should be rebased after #7384

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #7386 (3042062) into master (dfe76bb) will decrease coverage by 0.01%. The diff coverage is 51.28%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7386      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.87%   75.85%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         656      656              
  Lines      190105   190118      +13     
==========================================
- Hits       144236   144208      -28     
- Misses      45869    45910      +41     

Flag	Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus	60.45% <47.43%> (-0.07%)	:arrow_down:
suricata-verify	51.73% <46.26%> (-0.01%)	:arrow_down:
unittests	61.02% <17.14%> (-0.01%)	:arrow_down:

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[suricata-qa]

ERROR:

ERROR: QA failed on tlpw1_files_sha256.

field	test	baseline	%
	tlpr1_stats_chk
.app_layer.error.ftp-data.parser	0	395	0.0%

Pipeline 7347

[suricata-qa]

ERROR:

ERROR: QA failed on tlpw1_files_sha256.

field	test	baseline	%
	tlpr1_stats_chk
.app_layer.error.ftp-data.parser	0	395	0.0%

Pipeline 7347 WARNING: THERE IS A KNOWN BAD BASELINE WITH PACKET DROPS. bE MINDFUL OF ANY RESULTS.

[catenacyber]

Replaced by https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/7950