suricata
suricata copied to clipboard
Threshold flow/v7
SV_BRANCH=https://github.com/OISF/suricata-verify/pull/1788
Replaces https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/10632
- rebase
- ticket link for minor todo (https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/6855)
- add support for detection_filter as well
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/6822
Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 94.93671% with 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 83.06%. Comparing base (
2b4e102) to head (c74f901). Report is 101 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #10910 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 77.64% 83.06% +5.42%
==========================================
Files 922 924 +2
Lines 247806 263260 +15454
==========================================
+ Hits 192400 218670 +26270
+ Misses 55406 44590 -10816
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| fuzzcorpus | 64.68% <24.28%> (?) |
|
| suricata-verify | 62.45% <91.30%> (+0.02%) |
:arrow_up: |
| unittests | 62.76% <39.24%> (+0.55%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Information: QA ran without warnings.
Pipeline 20169
What is the relationship with #10925 ?
They look like conflicting at least for src/detect-engine-threshold.c
So, which one should get first ?
What is the relationship with #10925 ?
They look like conflicting at least for src/detect-engine-threshold.c
So, which one should get first ?
Doesn't matter, I'll have to rebase the other one first. But will wait for a proper review regardless.
Ok, will pick one for review next time
Btw I see no conflict here or locally.
I get a conflict when merging both PRs
I get a conflict when merging both PRs
They are independent, I'll deconflict them after one gets merged.
replaced by #11029